Request Revisions After Receiving My Paper
After the peer review process, you’ll get a decision from your editor about whether to accept or reject your manuscript. This will be followed by a list of reviewer comments on how to improve your work. It is very common for papers to go through multiple revise and resubmit cycles before getting published.
The most common editorial decisions are minor revisions and major revisions. If you receive a decision of minor revisions, it means that your paper will probably not be going back to the original reviewers for another round of comments – that’s actually policy in many journals. A decision of major revisions, on the other hand, means that your paper is in the running for publication but may have to undergo more rigorous analysis or experimental testing in order to be accepted by your target journal.
It’s a good idea to read through all the reviewer comments carefully and evaluate each point made. One helpful way to do this is to create a checklist of the feedback and the revisions required, either in a separate document or by copying all the revision suggestions into your main paper and writing homework market.com your response under each one. This is a very effective way to make sure that all revision requests are addressed. We also recommend working on a printed copy of the manuscript rather than an electronic version; problems that seem invisible on screen often show up better on print.
Can I Request Revisions After Receiving My Paper?
Once you’ve made a note of all the revisions, it’s a good idea to start with the most straightforward ones. Once these are completed, you can move on to the more complicated areas of your paper and address them in a similar manner. It’s a good idea to have a clear plan for dealing with each area of the paper before you begin and also to ask for help if you’re having trouble understanding or interpreting a particular comment.
If you find that there are certain revisions that are beyond the scope of your research (or that you don’t want to make at this time), then it’s a good idea to address these in a polite and courteous letter to the editor. Explain that you will consider pursuing the experiment in the future, and that you will inform your reviewers of this in your future communication.
Once you’ve tackled all of the revisions outlined in your editor’s decision, it’s time to submit your revised article. Don’t forget to include a letter to the editor that explains how you’ve dealt with all of the reviewer comments. Lastly, remember that rejection isn’t the end of the world; many famous scientists have had to go through multiple rounds of revise and resubmit before publishing their work!